Anthony Martinelli
02-10-2025
The official described the process as “delayed, but certainly not dead” and emphasized that Acting Administrator Derek Waltz has made it clear internally that he does not intend to halt the reform effort.
According to the official, Waltz has assured DEA personnel that “it’s not my intention to kill rescheduling,” signaling that the agency remains engaged in the review process. However, the timeline remains uncertain, with a DEA judge recently cancelling a series of public hearings that were set to begin on January 21 and run through March 6. The judge set a 90-day timeline to reassess the situation.Last year this same official correctly predicted the timing of the DEA’s rescheduling announcement, but was incorrect about a final order coming by October. The official told us in September that the delay was due to internal conflict causing a delay. The judge’s ruling in January gave credence to this statement, with the judge heavily criticizing the agency for failing to comply with procedural directives in its submission of evidence.
While we can verify that this individual is indeed employed by the DEA, their specific claims about the agency’s ongoing actions cannot be independently confirmed.
Comments