top of page
Writer's pictureJason Beck

'It was confusing': Colorado Springs voters expressed concerns over opposing cannabis initiatives

Colorado Springs voters recently faced a complex ballot choice involving two conflicting marijuana-related initiatives, sparking confusion among residents.



OG Article: here 

View our Fair Use Policy: here


Ballot Question 300, which allows existing medical cannabis stores to convert to recreational outlets, appeared to pass, but so did Ballot Question 2D, which would prohibit recreational cannabis stores in city limits.


According to Colorado Springs Mayor Yemi Mobolade, the passage of both measures poses a “legal dilemma,” as 2D would override 300 by amending the city charter to prohibit recreational stores entirely. The city’s spokesperson clarified that if any part of 300 conflicts with 2D, it cannot be enacted under the new charter rules.


Some residents on social media reported confusion due to the ballot language, with some expressing that these questions should not have appeared on the same ballot. Others stated they did not find the wording confusing but thought the questions should not have been voted on in the same election cycle.


Megan Graf from Citizens for Responsible Marijuana Regulation, which advocated for 300, criticized the city council’s opposition, expressing optimism that “responsible regulation will be law” once all votes are counted. The group looks forward to collaborating with city leaders to build a regulatory framework if Question 300 is able to move forward.


As officials review the results, the city attorney’s office will work to interpret the measures’ language and determine next steps for implementing these conflicting initiatives.

0 views

Comments


America's
#1 Daily
Cannabis News Show

"High at 9

broadcast was 🤩."

 

Rama Mayo
President of Green Street's Mom

bottom of page